Rent to own the new predatory lending in Real estate?

The concept of “Rent-to-Own” may seem appealing at first glance, but it’s raising concerns in the real estate industry as a potential form of predatory lending. In this model, a tenant rents a property for a set period—often a year or more—with the option to purchase it at the end of the lease.

While this arrangement may sound beneficial for both parties, it’s not without its risks.

Why It Works for Investors

For investors, rent-to-own offers a flexible option. They can essentially test out the property to see how much it yields, gauge its performance, and then decide if it’s worth purchasing. If the property doesn’t meet their expectations, they can walk away without the commitment of ownership.

Why It May Be Problematic for Sellers

On the other hand, for sellers, rent-to-own can be a frustrating option. Typically, sellers want to offload properties quickly to access their capital, but the rent-to-own model delays the sale process. Additionally, if the tenant decides not to buy after the lease period, the seller is back to square one—waiting for another buyer and potentially missing out on the peak market value of their property.

The Predatory Lending Angle

The real concern with rent-to-own agreements lies in how they can be structured unfairly, leaving tenants at a disadvantage. Often, the terms are more favourable to investors, with high upfront fees, strict purchase conditions, and even inflated purchase prices. For those who can’t qualify for a mortgage or other loans, this can seem like the only path to homeownership—making them vulnerable to predatory practices.

If you’re considering a rent-to-own agreement or have concerns about how this might affect your real estate investments, our team at Forge Real Estate can help you understand the pros, cons, and potential risks involved.